Ny studie fra Lene A H Haakstad og Kari Bø
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 May 12;251:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.014. Online ahead of print.
The Marathon of labour-Does Regular Exercise Training Influence Course of Labour and Mode of Delivery?: Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled TrialLene A H Haakstad 1, Kari Bø 2Affiliations expand
- PMID: 32460116
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.014
Objectives: Today all pregnant women are recommended to participate in moderate intensity aerobic and resistance-based physical activity/exercise ≥150 min/week. However, there are still controversies and scant knowledge on the role of regular exercise on delivery outcomes, including mode of delivery and length of active labour. In addition, nutritional counselling have often been examined together with exercise, which may independently effect the outcomes. Hence, the aims of the present study were to investigate the sole effect of supervised group exercise, including pelvic floor muscle training on course of labour and mode of delivery.
Study design: A single blind, randomized controlled trial, performed in the municipality of Oslo, Norway. Out of 105 healthy, inactive nulliparous women, initially enrolled (gestation week 17.7 ± 4.2) to study the effect regular aerobic exercise (60 min 2/week) on health benefits for both mother and her baby, 90 (85.7%) completed postpartum follow-up (7.7 ± 1.7) on labour outcomes (exercise: 43 and control: 47). Data were collected via standardized interviews and birth partographs from hospital records, reported on the postpartum visit (weeks after labour 7.6 ± 1.6). The primary investigator was unaware of the original randomization at the time of the interviews. The principal analysis was done on an intention to treat basis (ITT). For the planned subgroup analyses (per protocol), acceptable intervention adherence was defined as attending ≥ 80% of the recommended exercise program (≥ 19 exercise sessions).
Results: There were no differences between the exercise and control groups in induction of labour, use of analgesia, duration of active labour or prolonged labour, according to ITT. Per protocol analyses, showed a shorter duration of total active labour in the exercise group (6.8 ± 5.5 h) than the control group (9.8 ± 5.4 h), with a mean between group difference of 3.1 h (95% CI 0.31-5.9, p = 0.029). Rate of normal vaginal delivery was 85.7% among adherent participants and 62.3% in the control group (p = 0.051).
Conclusions: Regular exercise during pregnancy decreased duration of total active labour and showed a trend towards more normal vaginal deliveries among participants who adhered to the prescribed program.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00617149.
Keywords: Caesarean section; Exercise; Labour; Pregnancy; RCT.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. The manuscript contains original material only, and has not previously been reviewed elsewhere before this submission. We have followed the CONSORT 2010 checklist of information to include when reporting a randomized trial. No organization or persons have any financial interest in the study or findings presented in this article, and all participants gave written consent to participate and the procedures followed the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. We sincerely hope that the manuscript will be of interest to a broad audience and all the readers of European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, and to hear from you in the very near future.